🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president wooed voters with promises to reduce prices immediately upon taking office. However, once his inauguration, he seemed to pay minimal attention to affordability issues. This shifted following price-fatigued citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a hastily assembled campaign to tackle living costs. Regrettably, the drive has proven a disorganized endeavor—characterized by illogical claims, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Grocery Store Reality

Merely 48 hours after the election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Our groceries are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—revealed a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties when visiting the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, implying they were mistaken about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” proved absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. In what way could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% over the past year, beef prices went up almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—in part due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, prices rose in five of the six food categories monitored by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Statements

Despite these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his big lie about lower costs. After the vote, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements contradict the fact that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, that’s half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, Trump boasted that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, despite official data show they average $3.19.

Confronted by actual conditions and declining opinion polls, some Trump aides evidently cautioned that his “prices are down” rhetoric made him sound dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. A lot of voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb after assurances of reductions. In response, aides proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Impact

As certain taxes being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will likely announce that he has cut prices once these products start declining in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, Trump declared that “this is the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—especially when millions face cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

Per a survey from October, 74% of Americans believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter consider them positive. Another poll found that a majority of citizens say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s chief financial officer, recently disputed claims of a golden age. He stated that far from booming, certain sectors of the American economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to this weakness, Bessent called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president suggested a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, it seems like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will enact such a plan. This idea would likely raise government expenditure, push up interest rates, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

A further proposed solution for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that this would lower housing costs. However, reality is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to reduce installments—frequently cutting them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these loans could more than double the total interest borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Past Government and Economic Prospects

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have again blamed Biden for financial challenges, such as rising prices. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and untruthful allegations. Actually, the former president handed over a strong economy, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have created an economic mess, driving costs higher and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at a research firm, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by the administration’s trade policies. He worries that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, people generally possess less money to spend, and price increases usually declines. Unfortunately, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.